Comparing Material Types in A02-26u1 and Block 3 overall

The excavation unit A02-26u1 at Taukamayo presents lithic evidence, albeit synchronic to the Tiwanaku period, that is, in some ways, representative of the material use pattern in Block 3 overall. Distinct patterns emerge, however, with respect to the use of Ob2 obsidian, because as was noted Ob2 obsidian was rarely used outside of Block 3.

A02-26u1 Excavation

Block 3 total surface collection

Ob1

Ob2

Ob1

Ob2

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Proj Points

7

87.5

1

12.5

24

96.0

1

4.0

Bifaces

2

25.0

6

75.0

16

69.6

7

30.4

Rt'd Flakes

1

33.3

2

66.7

9

52.9

8

47.1%

Flakes

101

38.7

160

61.3

32

49.2

33

50.8

Cores

3

33.3

6

66.7

15

88.2

2

11.8

Total

114

39.5

175

60.6

96

65.3

51

34.7

Table 7-34. A02-26u1 Excavation and Block 3 surface: Lithic Tech. Classes by Obsidian type.

Table 7-34 shows that Ob1 obsidian was primarily used for projectile point production, however bifaces from Ob2 were used to a much greater extent at A02-26u1. Retouched flakes of the two material types were used in similar proportions in the two contexts.