Phase II Lithics Analysis

The lithics analysis conducted by A. Mackay, S. Morales, and N. Tripcevich is largely based on a modified version of the lithics analysis strategies that Mackay employs in projects at Australian National University under the direction of Dr. Peter Hiscock. This methodology was tailored to meet the needs of the Upper Colca project and to be comparable with lithics analysis in Andes that often have a more typological orientation.

During Phase II lithics analysis, the following measures were taken when possible. A custom MS Access form was designed for the Phase II lithics analysis that functioned with digital calipers to expedite gathering metric attributes digitally.

Name

Description

Illustrated

Material

Obsidian, Chert, Chalcedony, Fine-grained Volcanics (Rhyolite, Andesite, Basalt), Quartzite, Fine-grained siliceous, Igneous

Class and Type

Flake, core, heat shatter, hammerstone, groundstone, non-diagnostic fragment (NDF). Projectile Point, biface, retouched flake, perforator.

Color / Shade

Shades of obsidian: Black, white, clear, clear-banded, grey, grey-banded, brown, brown_banded. Other material types also included: red, black-orange, black-tan, olive, orange, pink, red-blue, red-brown, cream, white-tan, white-pink.

Weight (g)

Complete

True/False

Transverse snaps

Proximal, medial, distal - referring to existing segment.

Longitudinal snaps

Left or right - referring to existing segment

Percussive Metrics

Distance from Point of initiation to termination

Yes

Percussive Width

[Proximal, Medial, Distal] Distance across flake at 90 to force of application

Yes

Percussive Thickness

Distance from ventral to dorsal at midpoint of percussive length and percussive width (medial)

Yes

Platform width

Lateral distance across platform

Yes

Platform thickness

Distance across platform from dorsal to ventral

Yes

Platform preparation

Presence of overhang removal, faceting, or both (Whittaker 1994: 101)

Platform angle

Angle formed by intersection of platform and dorsal face.

Cortex percentage

% of cortex coverage in increments of 10. Flakes: dorsal and platform only, cores: whole piece.

Cortex location

On flakes: Dorsal, platform or both.

Cortex type

Rounded, tubular, irregular,

Heat affected

Y/N

Heat Type

Greasy luster, crazing, pot-lidding, shatter

Termination type

Feather, hinge, step, plunging (outre-passé)

Number of dorsal flake scars

Number of clear (with initation, termination or both) flake scars on dorsal surface of flake

Number of rotations

N-1 where N is the total number of different directions from which previous flakes have been struck, sensu Clarkson et al. (2006). Increments of 45°.

Retouched

Y/N

Retouch Type

Dorsal Ventral, both

# of retouched segments

Flake divided into 8 segments

Yes

Retouch data
(8 segments)

P, PL, PR, ML, MR, DL, DR, D: Degree and Angle of Retouch for each. Marginal = .5, Invasive = 1 following Clarkson (2002).

Yes

Table 5-8. Measures on flaked stone artifacts during Phase II lithics analysis with measures depicted in Figure 5-9 indicated in "Illustrated" column.

/misc/image035.jpg

Figure5-9. Showing some of the percussive metrics, platform metrics, and measures of retouch invasiveness for ventral side (Clarkson 2002) used in the Phase II analysis. Dorsal features and platform angle not shown.

Metric measures (shown in Table 5-6 and Figure 5-9) were taken with digital calipers accurate to 0.01 mm. The percussive length measure, rather than total a flake length measure, was used. Approximately 3,050 flakes were analyzed with these criteria.