The excavation unit A02-26u1 at Taukamayo presents lithic evidence, albeit synchronic to the Tiwanaku period, that is, in some ways, representative of the material use pattern in Block 3 overall. Distinct patterns emerge, however, with respect to the use of Ob2 obsidian, because as was noted Ob2 obsidian was rarely used outside of Block 3.
A02-26u1 Excavation |
Block 3 total surface collection |
|||||||
Ob1 |
Ob2 |
Ob1 |
Ob2 |
|||||
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
|
Proj Points |
7 |
87.5 |
1 |
12.5 |
24 |
96.0 |
1 |
4.0 |
Bifaces |
2 |
25.0 |
6 |
75.0 |
16 |
69.6 |
7 |
30.4 |
Rt'd Flakes |
1 |
33.3 |
2 |
66.7 |
9 |
52.9 |
8 |
47.1% |
Flakes |
101 |
38.7 |
160 |
61.3 |
32 |
49.2 |
33 |
50.8 |
Cores |
3 |
33.3 |
6 |
66.7 |
15 |
88.2 |
2 |
11.8 |
Total |
114 |
39.5 |
175 |
60.6 |
96 |
65.3 |
51 |
34.7 |
Table 7-34. A02-26u1 Excavation and Block 3 surface: Lithic Tech. Classes by Obsidian type.
Table 7-34 shows that Ob1 obsidian was primarily used for projectile point production, however bifaces from Ob2 were used to a much greater extent at A02-26u1. Retouched flakes of the two material types were used in similar proportions in the two contexts.